BSNL unions reject Esop offer in mega share sale

With the largest worker unions at Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, or BSNL, opposed to a proposed share sale in the state-owned phone firm, Union minister for communications and information technology Andimuthu Raja has offered the company’s more than 300,000 workers stock at Rs10 a share compared with the Rs300-400 he expects it to list at.
The Union government has started the process of selling shares in an initial public offering, or IPO, with BSNL’s board of directors last week approving a share sale of up to 10% equity shares in the company.BSNL is India’s largest phone services firm by sales with revenues of some Rs39,715 crore last fiscal and is projected at Rs50,000 crore by 2010.
“The trade unions have expressed their apprehensions saying that BSNL can be managed better without an IPO and that the employees will suffer. The plans for public listing will be finalized after some round of talks with the employee unions—individually and collectively,” Raja told reporters on Thursday after a first meeting with the unions.
ALSO READ
$100 billion valuation is low-end: BSNL
BSNL mulls IPO, 33% market share by 2010
Each BSNL employee will be offered 500 shares through employee stock option plans, or Esops, at a price of Rs10 each potentially netting each worker up to Rs200,000, the minister said.
BSNL’s director of finance S.D. Saxena said the IPO could take place within six months though investment bankers to the sale had not been appointed.
The worker unions, however, stuck to their stand. V.A.N. Namboodiri, general secretary of BSNL Employees Union, the largest such group at the New Delhi-headquartered firm, said his union would reject the stock option offer and that it remained opposed to the company’s listing.
A second trade union echoed the view. “Even the private companies are not going for IPO now. At present we need to improve the performance of the company,” Thomas K. John, general secretary, Federation of National Telecom Union, said over the phone, adding that an IPO was the first step towards privatization of the state-owned telecom services firm.
‘Each BSNL employee will be offered 500 shares through Esops, at Rs10 each, netting up to Rs200,000.’
Worker unions are powerful at BSNL. Some 13 unions represent 304,000 BSNL employees, but five of six workers are members of four unions. The largest among them are the BSNL Employees Union backed by the Communist Party of India (Marxist); Federation of National Telecom Union, which is supported by Intuc (Indian National Trade Union Congress); National Federation of Telecom Employees, the trade union wing of the Congress-backed Aituc (All India Trade Union Congress); and BMS (Bharat Mazdoor Sangh).
Analysts say union opposition and weak market sentiment—Indian shares have lost a quarter of their value this year, and IPO plans of about $4.1 billion have been deferred—could limit investor appetite for large offers.
“I have some reservations about such a large IPO,” said R.K. Gupta, managing director of Taurus Mutual Fund. “The first thing is they will have tough time in convincing the unions and just think of the kind of impact it would have on the broader market in terms of liquidity.”
In mobile subscribers, BSNL lags Bharti Airtel Ltd—whose market value is about $39 billion (Rs1,634 crore)—Reliance Communications Ltd and unlisted Vodafone Essar, which is controlled by Vodafone Plc.
At the end of June, BSNL had nearly 73 million wireless and fixed-line subscribers, slightly ahead of mobile services leader Bharti Airtel with nearly 72 million users.
In January, Saxena, had said the firm valued itself at $100 billion, and was looking at selling 10% to the public. On Thursday, he said BSNL was “still very aggressive” on the valuation.
In 2004, India raised $2.5 billion by selling a 10% stake in state-run oil producer Oil and Natural Gas Corp. Ltd, a record at the time, and $1.3 billion from a public offer of power producer NTPC Ltd.
They were the last big public offerings by state-run firms.
In a separate decision, the government had decided to compensate BSNL for revenue losses from running rural networks. “We have decided to exempt licence fees on landlines in rural areas, arising out of sharing of adjusted growth revenue (AGR), which will be Rs600-800 crore,” Raja said. Phone firms in India pay between 2% and 7% of gross revenue to the government as licence fees.
The government has, on recommendations from the country’s telecom regulator, decided to compensate BSNL for the losses on access deficit charges or a levy meant to compensate the phone firm for its rural business that was rescinded by the regulator in March.
The firm will be compensated Rs2,000 crore by India’s universal service obligation fund, the minister said.
New Delhi also has approved release of one block of spectrum or airwaves each to BSNL and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd to help them roll out 3G, or third generation, mobile phone services and have a first-mover advantage over private operators in the country.

Manji’s family waits for birth certificate

Thirteen-Day-Old Manji Yamada’s family said they were expecting her birth certificate on Friday since an application for the same had already been submitted with the Anand municipality in Gujarat on Thursday.


Related Stories Attack of the millipedes gives 2 Gujarat villages the crawls
Japanese baby gets a new ‘mother’ for now
Manoj Kumar seeks stay on TV premier of Om Shanti Om
Dark ages again as Orissa shuts for partial eclipse
Ad LinksFind My Father

Supreme Court of India

Japan Visa

The birth certificate may be Manji’s ticket back to her father Dr Yukufusi Yamada in Japan. However, this is possible only if there is cooperation between the Government of India, which has to issue travel documents, and Japanese embassy, which has to grant the visa.

Supreme Court advocate Indira Jaisingh, counsel for the Yamada family, said, “The birth certificate will establish Dr Yamada as the father, following which the Government of India can grant the travel documents. The Japanese embassy needs to grant a visa.” She added that according to the law, Manji would not be an Indian citizen, as neither of her parents is an Indian.

“The father, Dr Yamada is a Japanese citizen, while technically her maternal line cannot be proven. So she cannot be issued a passport,” Jaisingh said.

Dr Sanjay Arya, director of Arya Hospital in Jaipur where Manji is staying with her grandmother Emiko, said there would be no need to move court. “Since Dr Yamada and Emiko were present at the time of her birth, Dr Yamada is the father and Emiko the natural guardian,” Dr Arya said.

Legal experts predict minor hiccups before Manji can be reunited with her father. “The only issue could be the Government of India or the Japanese embassy insisting on proof of parentage. This can be substantiated with a DNA test,” Jaisingh said.

SIMI members remain under watch

Intelligence agencies claimed that former members of banned Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) have preferred to remain underground even after the recent decision of the special tribunal of Delhi High Court quashing the ban on them and subsequent Supreme Court's stay on the verdict. The cops too continued their vigil on the activists.

They maintained watch in several areas like Jaffernagar, Chhaoni, Borgaon, Mominpura, Hasanbagh where movement of underground Simi members have been noted. Cops are especially watching areas where former Simi members assembled on certain days. Though most former members are already on cops' radar, some members have really gone underground.

These include Irshad Ahmed, brother of Dr Abrar Arif, who had surrendered earlier in January this year. Imitiyaz, former city treasurer of the banned outfit, also remained underground for around two years before surrendering before court recently. Cops believe the underground members pose a threat. Apart from Nagpur, such vigilance was also kept in Akola, Buldana and Yavatmal districts.

Interrogation of Imitiyaz revealed that the outfit and its underground cadres enjoy support of a wide network of sympathizers. Some of them are also under a watch.