Indian American community leaders Tuesday wholeheartedly welcomed the news of the Manmohan Singh government winning the parliamentary confidence motion, terming it as an endorsement for the India-US nuclear deal.
'It is a mandate of the people of India for the nuclear deal. Ordinary people want energy, electricity,' Surinder Malhotra, president of the Indian National Overseas Congress, told IANS. The executive committee of the Overseas Congress was meeting later Tuesday evening to celebrate the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government's victory in the trial of strength, he added.
It is a welcome news for the Indian Americans, said Thomas Abraham, chairman of the Global Organisation of People of Indian Origin (Gopio) International, because the community had worked hard to change the minds of many US lawmakers to vote for the nuclear deal and would have been disappointed if the government had fallen.
He added: 'India not only needs more energy, the nuclear deal will also pave way for advanced countries to bring cutting edge technology into India, which it badly needs to be able to step ahead of rival China.'
Abraham felt that the go-ahead on the deal will also show to the world that India follows through its agreements and deals with others.
Yash Pal Soi, president of the Federation of Indian Associations (Tristate), said, 'With stability of the Indian government, progress in the country will continue.'
Sanku Rao, new president of the Association of American Physicians of Indian Origin (AAPI), said, 'It is good that Manmohan Singh continues as prime minister. He as finance minister laid down the financial structure that we have in India now, and he is a man of integrity. Also, now, hopefully, the nuclear deal, for which we worked hard, will not get delayed any further - it is a top priority to move with for India.'
Business leaders from the community also welcomed the development in India.
Tejinder Pal Singh Bindra, senior vice-president of the Jeetish group of companies in New York, who is also prominent in Sikh affairs, said: 'It is good that the Manmohan Singh government took a stand and succeeded. It will send a message that others cannot hijack its agenda.'
He added, 'It is good for business. Now more business and investment can flow into India. As an Indian and a Sikh, I welcome the news
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
US-India chamber to support next steps in securing n-deal
The US-India Business Council (USIBC) has pledged to energise its US Chamber-sponsored 'Coalition for Partnership with India' following Indian parliament's vote of confidence in favour of the next steps in securing the civilian nuclear deal with the US.
Referring to the news from India, USIBC president Ron Somers said, 'This marks a historic victory for India and for the globe. India's responsible record in developing its existing civilian nuclear power programme will bring much-needed talent and innovation to the 'nuclear renaissance' underway, necessary to stem global warming.'
USIBC had spearheaded legislation in 2006 to change the US Atomic Energy Act of 1954, enabling civilian nuclear cooperation with India.
The next step in the India-US nuclear deal is to reach a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on India's atomic power plants, setting the stage for consideration by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) to waive conditions relative to New Delhi.
That will enable civilian nuclear trade in technology and fuel by the Group member countries ending the 35-year technology denial regime that has been imposed against India.
The US, Britain, France, Russia, Japan, China, and most recently Australia - all key members of the NSG - have already voiced their support for ending the embargo against civilian nuclear trade with India, a USIBC press release said.
After NSG makes its rule changes, the US Congress must ratify the so-called 123 Agreement between the US and India, which will open the way for US companies to participate in civilian nuclear cooperation with India.
'US companies look forward to cooperating with Indian companies to achieve this important energy security infrastructure build-out,' Somers said.
He conceded that 'time is tight' because of the busy US Congressional calendar till the presidential election in November, but added: 'We are encouraged by recent statements made by Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Senator Joe Biden, who says he will find time to press for ratification of the 123 Agreement so long as India is able to complete its steps.
'USIBC and the Coalition for Partnership with India will be front and centre in this debate to ensure US Congressional passage,' Somers added.
The USIBC, formed in 1975 under the aegis of the US Chamber of Commerce, is the premier business advocacy organisation representing 280 of the largest US companies investing in India, joined by two dozen of India's largest global companies. It is mandated to deepen US-India commercial ties.
Coalition for Partnership with India comprises American businesses, academic institutions, associations, think tanks, and like-minded individuals supporting a deeper strategic partnership with India
Referring to the news from India, USIBC president Ron Somers said, 'This marks a historic victory for India and for the globe. India's responsible record in developing its existing civilian nuclear power programme will bring much-needed talent and innovation to the 'nuclear renaissance' underway, necessary to stem global warming.'
USIBC had spearheaded legislation in 2006 to change the US Atomic Energy Act of 1954, enabling civilian nuclear cooperation with India.
The next step in the India-US nuclear deal is to reach a safeguards agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on India's atomic power plants, setting the stage for consideration by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) to waive conditions relative to New Delhi.
That will enable civilian nuclear trade in technology and fuel by the Group member countries ending the 35-year technology denial regime that has been imposed against India.
The US, Britain, France, Russia, Japan, China, and most recently Australia - all key members of the NSG - have already voiced their support for ending the embargo against civilian nuclear trade with India, a USIBC press release said.
After NSG makes its rule changes, the US Congress must ratify the so-called 123 Agreement between the US and India, which will open the way for US companies to participate in civilian nuclear cooperation with India.
'US companies look forward to cooperating with Indian companies to achieve this important energy security infrastructure build-out,' Somers said.
He conceded that 'time is tight' because of the busy US Congressional calendar till the presidential election in November, but added: 'We are encouraged by recent statements made by Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Senator Joe Biden, who says he will find time to press for ratification of the 123 Agreement so long as India is able to complete its steps.
'USIBC and the Coalition for Partnership with India will be front and centre in this debate to ensure US Congressional passage,' Somers added.
The USIBC, formed in 1975 under the aegis of the US Chamber of Commerce, is the premier business advocacy organisation representing 280 of the largest US companies investing in India, joined by two dozen of India's largest global companies. It is mandated to deepen US-India commercial ties.
Coalition for Partnership with India comprises American businesses, academic institutions, associations, think tanks, and like-minded individuals supporting a deeper strategic partnership with India
Indian government survives vote
Congress supporters were jubilant after the vote
India's Congress party-led government has survived a vote of confidence over a civilian nuclear deal with the US.
The government motion received 275 votes with 256 against, Speaker Somnath Chatterjee said, hours after adjourning the debate amid claims of vote buying.
The vote came after the government's left-wing allies withdrew their support in protest at the controversial accord.
If the government had lost the vote, India would have faced early elections, casting the nuclear deal in doubt.
The lower house was packed to capacity, with MPs summoned from their sick beds and even from prison cells to take part in the vote.
After it was held there was brief confusion over the counting process. Most voting was electronic, but about 50 votes were cast on paper which delayed the result.
At least four MPs were too ill to vote from the chamber of the 543-seat house itself, but it is still not clear why so many MPs cast paper ballots.
A number of MPs also abstained.
TIMETABLE FOR NUCLEAR ACCORD
Approval needed from IAEA, expected to meet on 1 August
Consent also required from 45-member Nuclear Suppliers Group
Congress to approve deal before President Bush signs it into law
All this to happen before Mr Bush's tenure expires on 19 January 2009
Q&A: India confidence vote
There were Congress celebrations when victory became clear, with dancing supporters cheering, clapping and letting off firecrackers in front of party leader Sonia Gandhi's house in Delhi.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh thanked MPs for "such a convincing victory".
"This will send a message to the world at large... India is prepared to take its rightful place in the comity of nations," he told reporters.
The BBC's Sanjoy Majumder in Delhi says the vote had looked too close to call.
But the government managed to scrape through with the support of smaller parties and independent members.
India faces a general election next year and many political parties have used the debate over the nuclear deal to stake out their positions ahead of the polls, our correspondent says.
Tight vote
Two days of debate on the nuclear accord ended in uproar amid opposition allegations of vote buying.
Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) members waved fistfuls of money in the air, alleging that they had been offered bribes to abstain.
Advertisement
Opposition MPs wave 30 million rupees allegedly paid to buy their votes
Mr Chatterjee adjourned proceedings for several hours. He called it a "very sad day" for the Indian parliament, adding: "Nobody will be spared if found guilty."
The prime minister has promised his party will co-operate in an inquiry into the claims.
With the left withdrawing support, the government could rely on only 226 members in the 543-seat parliament, and needed 46 more to be absolutely sure of a majority.
India's media was awash with reports of alleged defections and desertions among MPs ahead of the vote.
Under the accord, India, which has not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, would gain access to US civilian nuclear technology and fuel.
Mr Singh called the victory "impressive"
In return its civilian nuclear facilities would be opened to inspection. Nuclear weapons sites would remain off-limits.
The communists fear the accord could give the US too much influence over Indian foreign and nuclear policy.
The main opposition Hindu nationalist BJP fears that the deal could compromise India's ability to test nuclear weapons in the future.
India is under pressure from Washington to sign the accord before the US presidential election in November.
Last week, Indian officials met members of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the world nuclear regulatory body, in Vienna to discuss plans to safeguard India's civilian nuclear facilities.
The IAEA's approval of the plan is a key condition for enacting the deal.
HAVE YOUR SAY Whether the government stays in power or not, it has lost the credibility and confidence of people at large
Rakesh Punia, Delhi
Send us your commentsIf the IAEA signs the agreement, the deal will go to the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group, which regulates global civilian nuclear trade, for approval.
It must then be approved by the US Congress before President Bush can sign it into law.
Critics of the deal fear assistance to India's civil programme could free-up additional radioactive material for bomb-making purposes.
India's Congress party-led government has survived a vote of confidence over a civilian nuclear deal with the US.
The government motion received 275 votes with 256 against, Speaker Somnath Chatterjee said, hours after adjourning the debate amid claims of vote buying.
The vote came after the government's left-wing allies withdrew their support in protest at the controversial accord.
If the government had lost the vote, India would have faced early elections, casting the nuclear deal in doubt.
The lower house was packed to capacity, with MPs summoned from their sick beds and even from prison cells to take part in the vote.
After it was held there was brief confusion over the counting process. Most voting was electronic, but about 50 votes were cast on paper which delayed the result.
At least four MPs were too ill to vote from the chamber of the 543-seat house itself, but it is still not clear why so many MPs cast paper ballots.
A number of MPs also abstained.
TIMETABLE FOR NUCLEAR ACCORD
Approval needed from IAEA, expected to meet on 1 August
Consent also required from 45-member Nuclear Suppliers Group
Congress to approve deal before President Bush signs it into law
All this to happen before Mr Bush's tenure expires on 19 January 2009
Q&A: India confidence vote
There were Congress celebrations when victory became clear, with dancing supporters cheering, clapping and letting off firecrackers in front of party leader Sonia Gandhi's house in Delhi.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh thanked MPs for "such a convincing victory".
"This will send a message to the world at large... India is prepared to take its rightful place in the comity of nations," he told reporters.
The BBC's Sanjoy Majumder in Delhi says the vote had looked too close to call.
But the government managed to scrape through with the support of smaller parties and independent members.
India faces a general election next year and many political parties have used the debate over the nuclear deal to stake out their positions ahead of the polls, our correspondent says.
Tight vote
Two days of debate on the nuclear accord ended in uproar amid opposition allegations of vote buying.
Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) members waved fistfuls of money in the air, alleging that they had been offered bribes to abstain.
Advertisement
Opposition MPs wave 30 million rupees allegedly paid to buy their votes
Mr Chatterjee adjourned proceedings for several hours. He called it a "very sad day" for the Indian parliament, adding: "Nobody will be spared if found guilty."
The prime minister has promised his party will co-operate in an inquiry into the claims.
With the left withdrawing support, the government could rely on only 226 members in the 543-seat parliament, and needed 46 more to be absolutely sure of a majority.
India's media was awash with reports of alleged defections and desertions among MPs ahead of the vote.
Under the accord, India, which has not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, would gain access to US civilian nuclear technology and fuel.
Mr Singh called the victory "impressive"
In return its civilian nuclear facilities would be opened to inspection. Nuclear weapons sites would remain off-limits.
The communists fear the accord could give the US too much influence over Indian foreign and nuclear policy.
The main opposition Hindu nationalist BJP fears that the deal could compromise India's ability to test nuclear weapons in the future.
India is under pressure from Washington to sign the accord before the US presidential election in November.
Last week, Indian officials met members of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the world nuclear regulatory body, in Vienna to discuss plans to safeguard India's civilian nuclear facilities.
The IAEA's approval of the plan is a key condition for enacting the deal.
HAVE YOUR SAY Whether the government stays in power or not, it has lost the credibility and confidence of people at large
Rakesh Punia, Delhi
Send us your commentsIf the IAEA signs the agreement, the deal will go to the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group, which regulates global civilian nuclear trade, for approval.
It must then be approved by the US Congress before President Bush can sign it into law.
Critics of the deal fear assistance to India's civil programme could free-up additional radioactive material for bomb-making purposes.
Oil plummets $5 a barrel
-- Oil prices fell Tuesday as a perceived decline in U.S. demand took hold again after worries subsided about disruption of production in the Gulf of Mexico.
Light, sweet crude for August delivery fell $5.09 to $125.95 a barrel at 11:35 a.m. ET. Trading of the August contract was set to conclude with the close of the market in New York.
Economy: Analysts said remarks by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and a huge loss posted by banking company Wachovia Corp. contributed to the perception that demand for oil will drop in a weakened economy.
"Reduced economic activity translates into reduced energy demand," said John Kilduff, energy analyst with MF Global.
Paulson, speaking in New York, called for Congress to pass a bill to shore up mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying they were the key to repairing the battered financial markets.
Wachovia (WB, Fortune 500) reported a net loss of $9 billion on losses related to home mortgages and the bank's declining market value.
As financial activity declines, consumers have less money to spend and businesses cut back on transportation, shipping and manufacturing activities, Kilduff said.
Others viewed Paulson's statement, along a speech from Philadelphia Fed governor Charles Plosser supporting a potential rate hike, as a sign that the United States is on the right track to fixing its financial problems, which also would cause investors to pull money out of oil.
"People aren't going to need to buy oil as a hedge against the dollar or systemic risk in the economy," said Phil Flynn, senior market analyst with Alaron Trading in Chicago.
Gasoline: High fuel prices, spurred on by oil's rise, have also done much to reduce demand, causing oil prices to shed more than $16 a barrel last week.
The average price of a gallon of gasoline fell 1.4 cents Tuesday to $4.055 a gallon Tuesday, according to a daily survey from motorist group AAA.
It was the fifth straight decline in the daily average, which has tumbled nearly 6 cents a gallon from the record high of $4.114 set last Wednesday.
Dolly: Oil producers Royal Dutch Shell and Exxon Mobil said Monday that while they were evacuating oil workers from the western part of the Gulf of Mexico, they expected Tropical Storm Dolly to have only a small effect on production.
The National Hurricane Center issued hurricane and tropical storm warnings Tuesday. It said Dolly - with heavy rains and winds up to 60 miles per hour, could touch the Gulf Coast Wednesday somewhere between Texas and northern Mexico.
"By tomorrow [Wednesday], assuming there has been no lasting damage, the attention will focus on the weekly [supply] report," said Peter Beutel, oil analyst at Cameron Hanover.
The Energy Department's weekly supply report was scheduled for release at 10:35 a.m. ET Wednesday.
The threat of Dolly to Gulf production had previously eclipsed concern about decreasing U.S. demand.
Iran: Beutel also said Iran remained a factor in the market, although not nearly as much of one as it has been in recent weeks.
Last weekend, at a meeting in Geneva, Iran rejected calls from the United States and five other world powers to freeze its nuclear program. The United States and its allies gave Iran two weeks to respond or face further United Nations sanctions.
Iran, the second-largest oil-producing member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, has been in the process of developing nuclear technology, and said it could respond to military threats by blockading the nearby Strait of Hormuz, which carries about 40% of the world's tanker traffic.
Light, sweet crude for August delivery fell $5.09 to $125.95 a barrel at 11:35 a.m. ET. Trading of the August contract was set to conclude with the close of the market in New York.
Economy: Analysts said remarks by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and a huge loss posted by banking company Wachovia Corp. contributed to the perception that demand for oil will drop in a weakened economy.
"Reduced economic activity translates into reduced energy demand," said John Kilduff, energy analyst with MF Global.
Paulson, speaking in New York, called for Congress to pass a bill to shore up mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying they were the key to repairing the battered financial markets.
Wachovia (WB, Fortune 500) reported a net loss of $9 billion on losses related to home mortgages and the bank's declining market value.
As financial activity declines, consumers have less money to spend and businesses cut back on transportation, shipping and manufacturing activities, Kilduff said.
Others viewed Paulson's statement, along a speech from Philadelphia Fed governor Charles Plosser supporting a potential rate hike, as a sign that the United States is on the right track to fixing its financial problems, which also would cause investors to pull money out of oil.
"People aren't going to need to buy oil as a hedge against the dollar or systemic risk in the economy," said Phil Flynn, senior market analyst with Alaron Trading in Chicago.
Gasoline: High fuel prices, spurred on by oil's rise, have also done much to reduce demand, causing oil prices to shed more than $16 a barrel last week.
The average price of a gallon of gasoline fell 1.4 cents Tuesday to $4.055 a gallon Tuesday, according to a daily survey from motorist group AAA.
It was the fifth straight decline in the daily average, which has tumbled nearly 6 cents a gallon from the record high of $4.114 set last Wednesday.
Dolly: Oil producers Royal Dutch Shell and Exxon Mobil said Monday that while they were evacuating oil workers from the western part of the Gulf of Mexico, they expected Tropical Storm Dolly to have only a small effect on production.
The National Hurricane Center issued hurricane and tropical storm warnings Tuesday. It said Dolly - with heavy rains and winds up to 60 miles per hour, could touch the Gulf Coast Wednesday somewhere between Texas and northern Mexico.
"By tomorrow [Wednesday], assuming there has been no lasting damage, the attention will focus on the weekly [supply] report," said Peter Beutel, oil analyst at Cameron Hanover.
The Energy Department's weekly supply report was scheduled for release at 10:35 a.m. ET Wednesday.
The threat of Dolly to Gulf production had previously eclipsed concern about decreasing U.S. demand.
Iran: Beutel also said Iran remained a factor in the market, although not nearly as much of one as it has been in recent weeks.
Last weekend, at a meeting in Geneva, Iran rejected calls from the United States and five other world powers to freeze its nuclear program. The United States and its allies gave Iran two weeks to respond or face further United Nations sanctions.
Iran, the second-largest oil-producing member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, has been in the process of developing nuclear technology, and said it could respond to military threats by blockading the nearby Strait of Hormuz, which carries about 40% of the world's tanker traffic.
Sunday, July 20, 2008
Gore's surprise visit highlights Netroots conference
Name-dropping Al Gore and his call for a switch to clean, renewable energy within 10 years was enough to pull whoops of approval from the 2,000 or 3,000 marauding liberals gathered for Netroots Nation at the Austin Convention Center on Saturday morning.
So when the former vice president and Nobel Prize co-winner made a surprise — and cleverly scripted — appearance during U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's talk, it looked like the conference might turn into a faint-in.
Talk that Pelosi (who is arguably so left-leaning that her parenthetical should be D-Beijing) would have a Very Special Guest had been buzzing about the conference of liberal bloggers, pols and media types since it began Thursday (it concludes today). But it wasn't clear to attendees that something was afoot until a schedule change handed out Saturday morning indicated the speaker's talk would last 45 minutes longer than previously indicated.
Not that Gore's appearance was necessary to whip up the troops.
From the beginning, it was clear these people were convinced the electoral map would be repainted with a brush sopping with blue paint come November.
The believers will tell you it's morning, that they smell the napalm. And it smells like, oh, yes, victory.
It didn't seem to matter that the conservative and much smaller Defending the American Dream Summit — featuring syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin and Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr — was going on in Austin at the same time. That was miles from downtown, so there was little chance for a rumble.
With the current administration's low approval rating, a charismatic presumptive Democratic nominee and a Republican opponent some in the GOP have been reluctant to even air-kiss, the energy was palpable and, like the political blogosphere, terribly self-confirming.
They went to panels about how the presidential election would be won house by house, block by block. They staged mock media interviews and critiqued themselves, and showed films ("Crawford") and Internet videos ("Harry Potter and Dark Lord Waldemart"). They attended panels on the war, health care, online social networks, volunteer organizing and expanding the networking power of something called an "Internet."
There was even one panel Friday featuring Princeton economics professor and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman (wearing, as if to galvanize stereotype, what appeared to be Birkenstocks) that was essentially about how the media weren't liberal enough.
As they say, only in Austin.
Filmmaker Paul Stekler, who teaches film production and politics at the University of Texas, said:"As you have greater democratization (through the use of technology to distribute one's message), you also have a greater degree of what's called confirmation bias. We live in a very different and weird world in terms of dissemination of information right now."
Indeed, you couldn't find anybody who disagreed that President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were "two ignoramuses," a label hurled by Parag Mehta, the Democratic National Committee's director of training.
Big names? Got 'em. There was Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, founder of the Daily Kos political blog, who hatched the idea a few years ago to get his like-minded pals together and who, in a Friday lunchtime keynote with Harold Ford Jr., chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council, seemed amazed at what the notion had unleashed.
"We're going to keep growing; we're going to keep pushing for an unapologetic Democratic Party," Moulitsas said.
Then there was John Dean, the former Nixon White House counsel who has made a second career of railing against what he considers right-wing excesses the way recovering alcoholics preach against strong drink.
"I have deep fear of my former tribe, and what they might do particularly in the law," Dean said, before going on to refer to former Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani as "Richard Nixon on crystal meth."
It's plinking bass in a barrel to paint liberals as overly intellectual types incapable of having fun unless reading Noam Chomsky counts, and it sure does for them. And there were a handful of colorful characters, including some men from Cedar Creek who looked like bikers and represented the Warrior Wolf Society, which they described as "a group of pagan warriors with wolf totem spirit," and a guy in a Bush mask and clothing with prison stripes.
But for the most part, these were serious-minded people, and decorum prevailed.
When a few people had the temerity to shout at Pelosi and Gore, they got shushed as mercilessly as they would have at a Nanci Griffith concert.
The no fun thing? Maybe it's because, as Democrats, they're not used to having it.
The incredible imploding presidential campaigns of Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis and John Kerry were used as textbook examples of what not to do. As political ad man John Rowley put it, he's been in the business for 15 years and only the last two have been good in terms of the political tide. Still, he said, "We've got to get ready for the day when we're not swimming downstream."
In other words, what a pendulum does is swing. But technology is power, and the left has been quicker to adopt it. As Gore put it Saturday morning:
"You are at the cutting edge of a new era of history. You will look back many years from now and tell your grandchildren about coming here to Austin, Texas, and about the first two meetings of Netroots Nation, and you will tell them that this was the beginning of an effort that was the start to reclaim the integrity of American democracy."
That is exactly what Joe Trippi had in mind. It was the one-time Howard Dean campaign aide who saw, perhaps a little too early and a little too enthusiastically, the transformative power of the Web. As he walked from one place to another Friday afternoon, he got stopped every 20 feet or so by people who knew him or at least knew of his ideas. And this is what they had wrought; this is what he had predicted.
"It's amazing," Trippi said. "I knew it was going to happen, but I'm still blown away that it happened."
So when the former vice president and Nobel Prize co-winner made a surprise — and cleverly scripted — appearance during U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's talk, it looked like the conference might turn into a faint-in.
Talk that Pelosi (who is arguably so left-leaning that her parenthetical should be D-Beijing) would have a Very Special Guest had been buzzing about the conference of liberal bloggers, pols and media types since it began Thursday (it concludes today). But it wasn't clear to attendees that something was afoot until a schedule change handed out Saturday morning indicated the speaker's talk would last 45 minutes longer than previously indicated.
Not that Gore's appearance was necessary to whip up the troops.
From the beginning, it was clear these people were convinced the electoral map would be repainted with a brush sopping with blue paint come November.
The believers will tell you it's morning, that they smell the napalm. And it smells like, oh, yes, victory.
It didn't seem to matter that the conservative and much smaller Defending the American Dream Summit — featuring syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin and Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr — was going on in Austin at the same time. That was miles from downtown, so there was little chance for a rumble.
With the current administration's low approval rating, a charismatic presumptive Democratic nominee and a Republican opponent some in the GOP have been reluctant to even air-kiss, the energy was palpable and, like the political blogosphere, terribly self-confirming.
They went to panels about how the presidential election would be won house by house, block by block. They staged mock media interviews and critiqued themselves, and showed films ("Crawford") and Internet videos ("Harry Potter and Dark Lord Waldemart"). They attended panels on the war, health care, online social networks, volunteer organizing and expanding the networking power of something called an "Internet."
There was even one panel Friday featuring Princeton economics professor and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman (wearing, as if to galvanize stereotype, what appeared to be Birkenstocks) that was essentially about how the media weren't liberal enough.
As they say, only in Austin.
Filmmaker Paul Stekler, who teaches film production and politics at the University of Texas, said:"As you have greater democratization (through the use of technology to distribute one's message), you also have a greater degree of what's called confirmation bias. We live in a very different and weird world in terms of dissemination of information right now."
Indeed, you couldn't find anybody who disagreed that President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were "two ignoramuses," a label hurled by Parag Mehta, the Democratic National Committee's director of training.
Big names? Got 'em. There was Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, founder of the Daily Kos political blog, who hatched the idea a few years ago to get his like-minded pals together and who, in a Friday lunchtime keynote with Harold Ford Jr., chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council, seemed amazed at what the notion had unleashed.
"We're going to keep growing; we're going to keep pushing for an unapologetic Democratic Party," Moulitsas said.
Then there was John Dean, the former Nixon White House counsel who has made a second career of railing against what he considers right-wing excesses the way recovering alcoholics preach against strong drink.
"I have deep fear of my former tribe, and what they might do particularly in the law," Dean said, before going on to refer to former Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani as "Richard Nixon on crystal meth."
It's plinking bass in a barrel to paint liberals as overly intellectual types incapable of having fun unless reading Noam Chomsky counts, and it sure does for them. And there were a handful of colorful characters, including some men from Cedar Creek who looked like bikers and represented the Warrior Wolf Society, which they described as "a group of pagan warriors with wolf totem spirit," and a guy in a Bush mask and clothing with prison stripes.
But for the most part, these were serious-minded people, and decorum prevailed.
When a few people had the temerity to shout at Pelosi and Gore, they got shushed as mercilessly as they would have at a Nanci Griffith concert.
The no fun thing? Maybe it's because, as Democrats, they're not used to having it.
The incredible imploding presidential campaigns of Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis and John Kerry were used as textbook examples of what not to do. As political ad man John Rowley put it, he's been in the business for 15 years and only the last two have been good in terms of the political tide. Still, he said, "We've got to get ready for the day when we're not swimming downstream."
In other words, what a pendulum does is swing. But technology is power, and the left has been quicker to adopt it. As Gore put it Saturday morning:
"You are at the cutting edge of a new era of history. You will look back many years from now and tell your grandchildren about coming here to Austin, Texas, and about the first two meetings of Netroots Nation, and you will tell them that this was the beginning of an effort that was the start to reclaim the integrity of American democracy."
That is exactly what Joe Trippi had in mind. It was the one-time Howard Dean campaign aide who saw, perhaps a little too early and a little too enthusiastically, the transformative power of the Web. As he walked from one place to another Friday afternoon, he got stopped every 20 feet or so by people who knew him or at least knew of his ideas. And this is what they had wrought; this is what he had predicted.
"It's amazing," Trippi said. "I knew it was going to happen, but I'm still blown away that it happened."
Govt hopes resting on independents and undecided MPs
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is seeking a trust vote in the Lok Sabha tomorrow with the Government on a razor's edge with hopes resting on independents and undecided MPs.
"That this House expresses its confidence in the Council of Ministers" will be the one-line motion the Prime Minister will move at the start of the session tomorrow. Voting is scheduled for Tuesday evening.
The Prime Minister will move the motion seeking confidence of the House in his Council of Ministers for the first time since the Congress-led coalition came to power four years ago.
Congress-led UPA and its new ally SP and its detractors including BJP-led NDA, UNPA, BSP and the Left parties are using every trick in the trade to muster numbers for and against the confidence motion.
The numbers game is a dicey affair as some small parties and independents could spoil the party for either side.
The strength of rival sides showed that the Government has to work hard to reach the magic figure of 271, the opposition too has to walk the extra mile to topple the Government.
Lok Sabha has an effective strength of 541 as there are two vacancies besides a member doesn't have voting rights while the Speaker could cast a vote in case of a tie.
The two-day session is the 14th session of the 14th Lok Sabha and has been convened specially for the trust vote.
Prime Minister is seeking the vote in the backdrop of Left withdrawing support to the coalition in the wake of the Government deciding to go ahead with the Indo-US nuclear deal. PTI
HOME CLOSE
"That this House expresses its confidence in the Council of Ministers" will be the one-line motion the Prime Minister will move at the start of the session tomorrow. Voting is scheduled for Tuesday evening.
The Prime Minister will move the motion seeking confidence of the House in his Council of Ministers for the first time since the Congress-led coalition came to power four years ago.
Congress-led UPA and its new ally SP and its detractors including BJP-led NDA, UNPA, BSP and the Left parties are using every trick in the trade to muster numbers for and against the confidence motion.
The numbers game is a dicey affair as some small parties and independents could spoil the party for either side.
The strength of rival sides showed that the Government has to work hard to reach the magic figure of 271, the opposition too has to walk the extra mile to topple the Government.
Lok Sabha has an effective strength of 541 as there are two vacancies besides a member doesn't have voting rights while the Speaker could cast a vote in case of a tie.
The two-day session is the 14th session of the 14th Lok Sabha and has been convened specially for the trust vote.
Prime Minister is seeking the vote in the backdrop of Left withdrawing support to the coalition in the wake of the Government deciding to go ahead with the Indo-US nuclear deal. PTI
HOME CLOSE
US watching trust vote with fingers crossed, lips sealed
With the fate of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government hanging in balance over the India-US civil nuclear deal, the Washington establishment is keeping its fingers crossed and lips sealed before Tuesday's trust vote.
The White House and the State Department have refrained from offering a comment lest it be taken as interference in another country's domestic affairs, but officials sure are hoping the Manmohan Singh government would survive.
For, the government's survival alone would give the embattled President George W. Bush one last chance to score a major foreign policy success of his administration though given the US legislative calendar, it still would not be a sure thing.
Also read
à Economic reforms: The unfinished agenda
à India Inc hopes reforms will now get a push
à Bookies bet on Manmohan Singh government to win
à US raises pitch to sell India its missile defence system
Absorbed as it is in the long US presidential election campaign, the US media had paid little attention to the brewing crisis in New Delhi so far, but the impending trust vote has indeed caught its attention.
"Even in the cacophony of Indian politics, there is one thing that everyone seems to agree on: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has absolute faith in his country's controversial civilian nuclear deal with the US," noted influential Time newsmagazine in a piece titled "Nuclear Brinksmanship".
So unshakable is his commitment to the agreement that Manmohan Singh has bet his political future on it, the weekly said.
"On July 22, Singh will find out whether his gamble has paid off - or if it has cost him his four-year-old administration.
"If they are to keep their jobs, Singh and other Congress party members have to convince voters, as well as lawmakers who are sitting on the fence, that the leadership hasn't sold out and turned India into a US pawn," it said referring to the Leftist parties' criticism of the deal.
Expecting the vote to be close, Time said: "With about a dozen lawmakers undecided, the prime minister can probably swing enough votes by making a few compromises. One compromise he will almost certainly not make: backing down on his deal with the US."
The White House and the State Department have refrained from offering a comment lest it be taken as interference in another country's domestic affairs, but officials sure are hoping the Manmohan Singh government would survive.
For, the government's survival alone would give the embattled President George W. Bush one last chance to score a major foreign policy success of his administration though given the US legislative calendar, it still would not be a sure thing.
Also read
à Economic reforms: The unfinished agenda
à India Inc hopes reforms will now get a push
à Bookies bet on Manmohan Singh government to win
à US raises pitch to sell India its missile defence system
Absorbed as it is in the long US presidential election campaign, the US media had paid little attention to the brewing crisis in New Delhi so far, but the impending trust vote has indeed caught its attention.
"Even in the cacophony of Indian politics, there is one thing that everyone seems to agree on: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has absolute faith in his country's controversial civilian nuclear deal with the US," noted influential Time newsmagazine in a piece titled "Nuclear Brinksmanship".
So unshakable is his commitment to the agreement that Manmohan Singh has bet his political future on it, the weekly said.
"On July 22, Singh will find out whether his gamble has paid off - or if it has cost him his four-year-old administration.
"If they are to keep their jobs, Singh and other Congress party members have to convince voters, as well as lawmakers who are sitting on the fence, that the leadership hasn't sold out and turned India into a US pawn," it said referring to the Leftist parties' criticism of the deal.
Expecting the vote to be close, Time said: "With about a dozen lawmakers undecided, the prime minister can probably swing enough votes by making a few compromises. One compromise he will almost certainly not make: backing down on his deal with the US."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)