A Riverside County Superior Court Judge on Thursday set bail of $300,000 for a local recycling center owner arrested along with two employees last week by special agents with the California Attorney General’s office for bilking the state’s beverage container recycling program out of $7 million. Bail was set at $30,000 each for the two employees.
“These people pretended to be recycling California aluminum cans when they were really importing tons of cans from Arizona, which are not eligible for California’s recycling refunds,” Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. said. “They brazenly defrauded the state’s successful recycling program.”
Howard Leveson, 68, owner of Perris Valley Recycling in Perris, Riverside County; Jose Barragan, 35, the center’s general manager, and Susie Ambriz-Molina, 25, an office worker, were arrested October 12. Leveson was also charged with illegal possession of an assault weapon.
They face a total of 18 felony counts on charges including recycling fraud, grand theft and conspiracy. If convicted of all charges, they could each spend seven years in prison.
Special agents with the California Attorney General’s office, working with the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), conducted the investigation into Perris Valley Recycling with the help of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department. The Attorney General’s office is prosecuting the case. CalRecycle oversees the state’s beverage container recycling program.
A search of Leveson’s home and business recovered $50,973 in cash and an Uzi assault rifle. In addition, Leveson’s assets and those of his business were frozen, including $4.2 million in bank accounts.
From February 2009 until July 2010, Perris Valley Recycling collected as much as 10,000 pounds per day in aluminum cans, far more than comparable facilities, which average about 500 pounds per day. The unusually high volume indicated the possibility that out-of-state containers were being brought to the facility.
In Arizona, aluminum is sold only for its scrap value. California, however, has the added incentive of the California Refund Value (CRV) deposit, which pays $1.57 for a pound of used aluminum cans.
Investigators estimate Perris Valley Recycling took in 4.4 million pounds of cans trucked from Arizona, then illegally claimed as much as $7 million in reimbursement from the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund.
As a deterrent to such fraud, recycling centers are required to report to CalRecycle purchases of more than 250 pounds of aluminum CRV material. According to investigators, Perris Valley Recycling hid the size of incoming loads by creating multiple weight tickets for trucks coming in with loads larger than 250 pounds, making it appear they were many individuals with smaller loads.
Over the past five months, 20 people have been arrested for making deliveries of out-of-state containers to the Perris center, whose slogan is “It’s Not Trash, It’s Cash.” Perris Valley Recycling remains open, however CalRecycle continues to conduct inspections and has placed restrictions on the center’s reimbursement claims.
In California, consumers pay CRV at the checkout stand when purchasing beverages in bottles or cans. When the empty container is redeemed at one of California’s more than 2,000 recycling centers, the CRV is returned to the consumer. Recycling centers recoup the CRV from the state and then make money by reselling the materials for scrap value. When an out-of-state can or bottle is fraudulently redeemed in California, the program loses money.
Toledo Agrees to Improve Sewer System
The city of Toledo, Ohio, has agreed to make extensive improvements to its sewer system that will significantly reduce the city’s longstanding sewage overflows into Swan Creek and the Maumee and Ottawa Rivers, the city’s main waterways, the Department of Justice, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the state of Ohio announced on Friday.
The Clean Water Act settlement lodged Friday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, modifies a 2002 agreement between the United States, state of Ohio and city of Toledo. The 2002 agreement required that Toledo greatly expand its treatment plant and build a large storage basin to capture stormwater combined with sewage during high flows for later treatment. The parties understood that although the improvements were important, they were only the first phase of the work needed to bring Toledo into compliance with the Clean Water Act.
The 2002 agreement also required Toledo to conduct a detailed study of the combined portions of its sewer system and propose a plan of additional measures to eliminate or substantially reduce wet weather discharges from Toledo’s combined sewers. Friday’s agreement requires the city to implement this plan, which both the U.S. EPA and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) have now approved.
Under the amended agreement filed Friday in federal court, Toledo has agreed to expand its sewer system far beyond what it originally proposed to the U.S. EPA and Ohio EPA at a cost estimated at more than $315 million. Once the sewer system expansion is fully constructed as required by the amended agreement, Toledo will reduce its discharges of untreated combined sewage from an average of 35 times in a year to an average of zero to four times per year, depending upon the watershed.
The amended agreement relieves Toledo from having to provide additional equipment at its wastewater treatment plant as required by the 2002 agreement
The modified settlement lodged Friday as the First Amendment to Consent Decree in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, is subject to a 30-day public comment period and approval by the federal court.
Fertilizer Company Cited for Hazardous Waste Violations
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 7 on Friday filed a civil complaint and issued a compliance order to MagnaGro Corporation, of Lawrence, Kan., for allegedly failing to conduct hazardous waste determinations as required by Kansas regulations and the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
According to EPA, two employees of the agricultural fertilizer company died of asphyxiation on April 1, 2010, while cleaning a storage tank at its facilities in Lawrence, according to autopsy reports. Following the incident, in June and July, EPA staff conducted a compliance inspection of the facilities, and noted several suspected solid and hazardous wastes at the site.
Inspectors issued an official notice of violation and request for information to MagnaGro’s owner, Ray Sawyer, on July 28, but he did not respond. Sawyer likewise did not respond to a September 9 letter of warning and request for information. EPA Region 7 has offered assistance to Sawyer regarding the suspected solid and hazardous wastes on the property, but he has not responded to those offers.
The City of Lawrence shut down operations at MagnaGro on July 21, 2010, after Sawyer failed to address a series of city code violations. The Lawrence Fire Department has also issued citations to Sawyer, requiring him to address safety violations before the facility is allowed to reopen.
EPA’s complaint and compliance order from EPA requires MagnaGro to act within 30 days to provide EPA with an inventory of all drums, totes and other containers at the facility, along with proper waste determinations. It also requires the company to submit to EPA a written plan for immediately shipping all hazardous waste currently located at the facility to an appropriate disposal facility. The plan must be approved by EPA, with disposal of wastes to be completed within 20 days after that approval.
MagnaGro has the right to request an administrative hearing with EPA within 30 days of the compliance order. Failure to provide EPA with a timely response to the order could result in the company being found in default, which would constitute an admission of all facts alleged in the order, and a waiver of rights to a hearing.
Lead-Based Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule Workshop to be held in Jacksonville, FL
Representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in conjunction with the Duval County Health Department’s Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program, and Florida State College will be conducting a Compliance Assistance Workshop on the new Renovation, Repair & Painting Rule (RRP) in Jacksonville, Florida on October 27, 2010. The workshop will include discussions on the Lead-Based Paint Disclosure Rule, as well as RRP, its training components, and the importance of lead safe work practices.
Because lead-based paint in homes and child occupied facilities built prior to 1978 is the primary cause of childhood lead poisoning, the Lead Safe RRP rule places new requirements on property management companies, landlords, contractors, renovators and painters for lead safe work practices to reduce the lead exposure of children.
WHO: EPA, Duval County Health Department’s Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program, and Florida State College
WHAT: Compliance Assistance Workshop on the new Lead-Based Renovation, Repair & Painting Rule
WHEN: October 27, 2010 from 4:00 p.m. until 7:30 p.m.
WHERE: Florida State College (downtown campus)
Building A, room 1068
101 W Street
Jacksonville, Florida 32202.
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter
Reader CommentsThere are no comments for this story.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
AdvertisersBacked by more than a century of confidence.
Use UL EnvironmentSM for all your sustainability initiatives. >>
Trends in Sustainability Performance Management
Take the lead on sustainability. - Take the lead in your industry. >>
Can you report emissions without omissions?
Sustainability Leadership Series by Paul Baier, Groom Energy & CA >>
Custom market research for cleantech sector
Electric vehicles to the Smart Grid: visit Zpryme Research. >>
>> Log into your EL Insights account
Upcoming Webinars [ see all ]In the Trenches — 5 Ways to Drive Sustainability Best Practices
Recent Daily News [ see all ]10/25/2010 10/22/2010 10/21/2010 Best Practices – How Wyndham Worldwide Measures and Improves Environmental Performance
LEED Roundup: Schneider, SKF, Legg Mason, MasterCard, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Ingersoll Rand Saves $4M in Energy Costs
Gas Shale and Hydraulic Fracturing Work for Our Nation
Environmental Enforcement Roundup: Recycling Fraud, Toledo Sewer Agreement, Fertilizer Waste Violations, Lead Abatement Workshop
Ten Smart-Grid Trends to Watch in 2011
Clif Bar Boasts Sustainable HQ
Federal Agencies Push Renewable Energy, Truck Fuel Efficiency
PricewaterhouseCoopers Leads Top Green-IT User Ranking
Roundup – Chevy, UMass Medical, Toyota
Schneider Consolidates U.S. Data Centers
Contract Roundup: Siemens, EnerNOC, EPS, Tetra Tech
Green Job Projections in Latest Issue of EL Insights
Caltech, IKEA, Coke Power Up Clean Power Systems
Environmental Enforcement Roundup: PCB Cleanup; School Asbestos Violations; PVC Mfr Penalties; Import Safety Task Force
USPTO to Extend Green Patent Deadline
Microsoft Citizenship Report: Data Centers consume 50% Less Energy
Roundup – GE, eBay, Boeing
Biopolymers Are Dirtier to Produce than Oil-Based Polymers, say Researchers
Intertek Gears Up For Energy Star Enhanced Testing and Verification
Environmental Enforcement Roundup: Cement Plant Air Penalties; Misbranded Sanitizers; Oil Facility Discharges
Fuji Xerox Australia: Video Sustainability Report
Advantest Buys RECs to Offset 100% of Electricity Use
U.S. Recycle Rate for PET Containers Rise to 28%
‘I Don’t Care about the Environment…’
NAD Questions Wind Energy Claims in Ziploc Bag Ads
PC Power Management Tools Reduce Energy Use by 45%
APS, Sundance Square, Pacific Power Recognized as Green Power PR Leaders
Roundup – Navy, Starbucks, GM
Coke, Del Monte, Kraft, Wal-Mart Get Failing Grades for Using BPA
Charts [ see all ] Ten Smart-Grid Trends to Watch in 2011
Biopolymers Are Dirtier to Produce than Oil-Based Polymers, say Researchers
U.S. Recycle Rate for PET Containers Rise to 28%
PC Power Management Tools Reduce Energy Use by 45%
White Papers [ see all ]Building Sustainability in Hard Times: Integrated EHS Platforms Support Cost Savings
Get Green Powered and Lower Your Energy Costs
Eco-Competitiveness: Safeguarding Profitability and the World's Natural Resources
The Revolution in Warehouse Lighting: LEDs and Intelligent Lighting Systems
What's On Your Sustainability Dashboard?
9 Ways to Reduce Energy Costs
JobsView All Jobs >> Post a Job >>
Recent Jobs
View All Jobs
Post a Job
Jobs powered by Simply Hired Comments and Discussions
Alan on Biopolymers Are Dirtier to Produce than Oil-Based Polymers, say Researchers
"This article makes a well-reasoned point. It’s wrong to..."
Gisela Schmidt on USGBC Sued Over False Advertising, Fraud
"I agree with most of the comments above and want to add that meeting an Owner’s..."
bill haaf on Gas Shale and Hydraulic Fracturing Work for Our Nation
"I really support nat gas to replace coal and help reduce our carbon footprint...."
M. Worrell on Odwalla, Replenish Offer Eco-Friendly Packaging
"Love the PlantBottle. The cleaner idea is good but A&H has proven average consumers..."
clay rager on IKEA Claims Largest Retail Rooftop Solar Installation in Canada
"Cold… but sun(irradiation) at the right temperature for the panels..."
Sean White on IKEA Claims Largest Retail Rooftop Solar Installation in Canada
"In Ontario, there are some of the best incentives in the world for..."
Global Energy on Biopolymers Are Dirtier to Produce than Oil-Based Polymers, say Researchers
"I thought Environmental Leader was a serious news source...."
Monday, October 25, 2010
Friday, October 22, 2010
Thursday, October 21, 2010
NASA confirms presence of water ice on Earth’s moon
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) on Thursday confirmed the presence of water ice on the Earth’s moon as well as its water cycle after nearly a year since the discovery of water molecules on the natural satellite.
“NASA has convincingly confirmed the presence of water ice and characterized its patchy distribution in permanently shadowed regions of the moon,” said Michael Wargo, chief lunar scientist at NASA.
The new data was uncovered by NASA’s Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LRCROSS) and the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). It is a step forward by NASA to a better understanding of the solar system, its resources, origin, evolution and future.
The two missions found evidence that the lunar soil within shadowy craters is rich in useful materials, and that the moon has a water cycle and is chemically active. Scientists discovered that water was present in the form of mostly pure ice crystals in some places.
On October 9, 2009, both LCROSS and a companion rocket impacted the moon’s Cabeus crater lifting a plume of material that might have not been exposed to sunlight for billions of years. The plume traveled nearly 10 miles above the rim of Cabeus and instruments aboard LCROSS and LRO examined the debris and vapor clouds.
After the twin impacts, grains of mostly pure water ice were in the plume meaning that water ice was somehow delivered to the moon in the past or a chemical process caused ice to accumulate in large quantities.
“The diversity and abundance of certain materials called volatiles in the plume, suggest a variety of sources, like comets and asteroids, and an active water cycle within the lunar shadows,” said Anthony Colaprete, LCROSS project scientist.
Volatiles are compounds that freeze and are trapped in the cold lunar craters and vaporize when warmed by the sun. LCROSS and LRO determined that 20 percent of the materials in the plume were volatiles, including methane, ammonia, hydrogen gas, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.
In addition, relatively large amounts of light metals like sodium, mercury and silver were discovered. Scientists believe that the water and volatiles could have been left by a come impact. However, the volatile chemicals are also evidence of a cycle in which water ice reacts with lunar soil grains.
The proportion of volatiles to water in the lunar soil indicates a process called “cold grain chemistry” is taking place. This process could take hundreds of thousands of years and may occur in asteroids; the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, including Europa and Enceladus; Mars’ moons; interstellar dust grains floating around other stars and the polar regions of Mercury.
With this knowledge of the moon’s water cycle and processes, future mission planners could better determine locations with easily-accessible water. The existence of mostly pure water ice could mean future human explorers won’t have to retrieve the water out of the soil.
In addition, an abundant presence of hydrogen gas, ammonia and methane could be exploited to produce fuel.
“NASA has convincingly confirmed the presence of water ice and characterized its patchy distribution in permanently shadowed regions of the moon,” said Michael Wargo, chief lunar scientist at NASA.
The new data was uncovered by NASA’s Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LRCROSS) and the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO). It is a step forward by NASA to a better understanding of the solar system, its resources, origin, evolution and future.
The two missions found evidence that the lunar soil within shadowy craters is rich in useful materials, and that the moon has a water cycle and is chemically active. Scientists discovered that water was present in the form of mostly pure ice crystals in some places.
On October 9, 2009, both LCROSS and a companion rocket impacted the moon’s Cabeus crater lifting a plume of material that might have not been exposed to sunlight for billions of years. The plume traveled nearly 10 miles above the rim of Cabeus and instruments aboard LCROSS and LRO examined the debris and vapor clouds.
After the twin impacts, grains of mostly pure water ice were in the plume meaning that water ice was somehow delivered to the moon in the past or a chemical process caused ice to accumulate in large quantities.
“The diversity and abundance of certain materials called volatiles in the plume, suggest a variety of sources, like comets and asteroids, and an active water cycle within the lunar shadows,” said Anthony Colaprete, LCROSS project scientist.
Volatiles are compounds that freeze and are trapped in the cold lunar craters and vaporize when warmed by the sun. LCROSS and LRO determined that 20 percent of the materials in the plume were volatiles, including methane, ammonia, hydrogen gas, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.
In addition, relatively large amounts of light metals like sodium, mercury and silver were discovered. Scientists believe that the water and volatiles could have been left by a come impact. However, the volatile chemicals are also evidence of a cycle in which water ice reacts with lunar soil grains.
The proportion of volatiles to water in the lunar soil indicates a process called “cold grain chemistry” is taking place. This process could take hundreds of thousands of years and may occur in asteroids; the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, including Europa and Enceladus; Mars’ moons; interstellar dust grains floating around other stars and the polar regions of Mercury.
With this knowledge of the moon’s water cycle and processes, future mission planners could better determine locations with easily-accessible water. The existence of mostly pure water ice could mean future human explorers won’t have to retrieve the water out of the soil.
In addition, an abundant presence of hydrogen gas, ammonia and methane could be exploited to produce fuel.
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
How Facebook, eBay Improve Energy Efficiency in Data Centers
Better airflow management helps improve energy efficiency and cut electricity costs in data centers according to one tip shared by Facebook and eBay, reports Computerworld.
Facebook and eBay shared some energy-saving tips at a recent panel session, “holistic approaches to reducing energy use,” at the Silicon Valley Leadership Group’s Data Center Efficiency Summit, reports Computerworld.
Jay Park, Facebook’s director of data center engineering, said during the panel session that the company cut its costs by $230,000 a year at a 56,000-square-foot data center in Santa Clara, Calif., thanks to better air flow management, along with a $294,000 rebate from its electric utiliy.
After a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis indicated that Facebook’s data center had warm air mixing with cold air above and around server aisles, the company chose a cold aisle containment project to make the cooling systems more efficient.
The project entailed closing the tops and ends of server aisles with fire retardant plastic to prevent cold air blowing up through perforated floor tiles from escaping, and allowed the company to shut down 15 of its computer room air handlers (CRAHs), reducing its energy draw by 114 kW, according to Computerworld. It also enabled it to raise the air temperature at the CRAH inlets from 72 degrees to 81 degrees F.
Facebook also worked with its vendor to reduce the fan speed in each of the servers via a firmware update, which saved 3 watts per server.
Facebook says it is currently building one of the most energy-efficient data centers to date in Prineville, Oregon. However, Greenpeace started a campaign in February to get Facebook to power the data center with renewable energy instead of coal.
EBay also conducted a CFD analysis for its data center and decided on a cold-aisle containment project for its 80,000 square foot facility in Phoenix, reports Computerworld. The company installed blanking panels to prevent cold air escaping from the server racks and variable-speed fans in its 86 30-ton CRAHs.
eBay also worked with its supplier of universal power supplies to reduce excess capacity in those systems.
Rick Rehyner, senior manager for eBay’s global data center operations, said in the article that eBay worked with the utility provider to get a rebate, “which made it worthwhile.”
Rehyner also noted that the project reduced total power consumption and carbon emissions at eBay’s data center by about 16 percent. Over the 18-month life of the project its total IT power load increased 50 percent because more servers were added, but the power load for the whole data center increased only 25 percent thanks to less power required for cooling, according to Computerworld.
In May, eBay opened its $287-million Topaz data center in Utah that the company says is 50 percent less expensive to operate than the average of all other data centers eBay leases thanks to many energy-efficiency features including a power usage effectiveness (PUE) rating of 1.4.
courtsey environmentalleader
Facebook and eBay shared some energy-saving tips at a recent panel session, “holistic approaches to reducing energy use,” at the Silicon Valley Leadership Group’s Data Center Efficiency Summit, reports Computerworld.
Jay Park, Facebook’s director of data center engineering, said during the panel session that the company cut its costs by $230,000 a year at a 56,000-square-foot data center in Santa Clara, Calif., thanks to better air flow management, along with a $294,000 rebate from its electric utiliy.
After a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis indicated that Facebook’s data center had warm air mixing with cold air above and around server aisles, the company chose a cold aisle containment project to make the cooling systems more efficient.
The project entailed closing the tops and ends of server aisles with fire retardant plastic to prevent cold air blowing up through perforated floor tiles from escaping, and allowed the company to shut down 15 of its computer room air handlers (CRAHs), reducing its energy draw by 114 kW, according to Computerworld. It also enabled it to raise the air temperature at the CRAH inlets from 72 degrees to 81 degrees F.
Facebook also worked with its vendor to reduce the fan speed in each of the servers via a firmware update, which saved 3 watts per server.
Facebook says it is currently building one of the most energy-efficient data centers to date in Prineville, Oregon. However, Greenpeace started a campaign in February to get Facebook to power the data center with renewable energy instead of coal.
EBay also conducted a CFD analysis for its data center and decided on a cold-aisle containment project for its 80,000 square foot facility in Phoenix, reports Computerworld. The company installed blanking panels to prevent cold air escaping from the server racks and variable-speed fans in its 86 30-ton CRAHs.
eBay also worked with its supplier of universal power supplies to reduce excess capacity in those systems.
Rick Rehyner, senior manager for eBay’s global data center operations, said in the article that eBay worked with the utility provider to get a rebate, “which made it worthwhile.”
Rehyner also noted that the project reduced total power consumption and carbon emissions at eBay’s data center by about 16 percent. Over the 18-month life of the project its total IT power load increased 50 percent because more servers were added, but the power load for the whole data center increased only 25 percent thanks to less power required for cooling, according to Computerworld.
In May, eBay opened its $287-million Topaz data center in Utah that the company says is 50 percent less expensive to operate than the average of all other data centers eBay leases thanks to many energy-efficiency features including a power usage effectiveness (PUE) rating of 1.4.
courtsey environmentalleader
U.S. Environmental Policy Part II: Policymaking Today
The policymaking process in the United States relies heavily on society’s desire for action. This point cannot be underemphasized. Without gaining public support for an issue, the legislature has little political incentive to develop a plan of action. The two primary ways of generating public support for an issue are 1) through organized groups who are able to educate others about the problem, and 2) through the media.
If an environmental campaign is successful, interest groups and elected officials will have the necessary information to both 1) understand the problem and 2) identify what policy measures will effectively fix it
In the U.S., a policy cycle begins with the creation of a course of action, followed by enactment of a law, and then actions that are designed to carry out that law successfully. Then, when any policy has been in place for a reasonable period of time, it should be re-evaluated to determine if it has achieved the original goals, what the costs were, and what changes, if any, need to be made. This was keenly pointed out by Vig and Kraft in their seminal book, Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, 2006).
While the job of writing effective environmental legislation falls to the Congress, the president – in this case President Obama — also has an important role to play. Beyond simply signing or vetoing a bill sent to him by the Congress, the president is involved in setting the policy agenda. For example, a president concerned with taxes, downsizing and meeting the needs of large businesses will likely have a very different set of goals he wants achieved during his term than will a president who wishes to put more emphasis on the environment and conservation of natural resources. With the right combination of public support, Congressional leadership, and bipartisanship, effective environmental regulations and laws can be made. By delegating staff and other experts to particular issues, and by working with Congress to reach a desired outcome, the White House can influence the shape of environmental laws. Of course, the process is often complicated by gridlock. Rarely – if ever – does a significant majority of legislators agree on anything. Bills may or may not even reach the floor for a vote, depending on the party in power, the ability to reach agreement, and seemingly inevitable gridlock due to stalling tactics.
In Washington, the actual job of carrying out the implementation of a policy falls on the different executive departments. While all departments are involved in environmental quality to varying degrees, major regulators include the EPA, Interior Department, the Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Agriculture or USDA. And, as part of the balance of power in the U.S., the judiciary inevitably becomes involved in challenges to environmental policy.
Environmental law – checks and balances
Jurisdiction and the wording of the law are never crystal-clear. Legal challenges help to define boundaries on the reach of the regulatory agencies. A timely example of this policymaking process at work can be seen in the discussion of climate change and energy usage.
The climate change example breaks down like this: We’ve known for years that our current energy economy, based largely on fossil fuels, is unsustainable. Burning coal and oil to generate electricity, heat our homes, and fuel our cars not only pollutes the air and water but also adds staggering amounts of carbon to the atmosphere and oceans, which leads to climate change and the destruction of ecosystems. Yet, the United States has done little over the past few decades to curb energy use and carbon emissions. As a nation we’ve lacked the critical threshold of vocal citizens demanding change, and we’ve lacked political will to generate more enthusiasm for change. Only now are we beginning to see a possible shift in this state of mind. More people are concerned about energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and the science has improved to the point where there is very little doubt that humans are the driving force behind this phenomenon. Also, the current president (who campaigned on a desire to combat climate change) along with a relatively sympathetic Congress, United Nations, not to mention Corporate Leaders for Climate Change, share many similar policy goals. He has an easier time setting the agenda than if the party makeup of the House and Senate was more conservative, as it had been just several years ago.
While the political will for something like the Kyoto Protocol did not exist in the previous decade, we now are looking at a somewhat more favorable environment for that kind of legislation. The House recently passed the so-called Waxman-Markey bill, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, by a vote of 219 to 212 (Govtrack.us 2009). While the bill’s fate in the Senate is far from certain, clearly the right combination of attitudes and leadership exist to make this possible. Should climate legislation pass, the other steps in the policy cycle must also be seen through. Simply setting standards will not be enough.
In the final analysis, U.S. policy processes for environmental regulation do represent the American democratic process. An honorable legacy with our own children as well as our legacy as a nation is at stake. The hope is that this fair, reasonable democratic process will allow for suitable, correct action from policymakers with regards to this legacy.
COURTSEY. ENVIRONMENTAL LEADER
If an environmental campaign is successful, interest groups and elected officials will have the necessary information to both 1) understand the problem and 2) identify what policy measures will effectively fix it
In the U.S., a policy cycle begins with the creation of a course of action, followed by enactment of a law, and then actions that are designed to carry out that law successfully. Then, when any policy has been in place for a reasonable period of time, it should be re-evaluated to determine if it has achieved the original goals, what the costs were, and what changes, if any, need to be made. This was keenly pointed out by Vig and Kraft in their seminal book, Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, 2006).
While the job of writing effective environmental legislation falls to the Congress, the president – in this case President Obama — also has an important role to play. Beyond simply signing or vetoing a bill sent to him by the Congress, the president is involved in setting the policy agenda. For example, a president concerned with taxes, downsizing and meeting the needs of large businesses will likely have a very different set of goals he wants achieved during his term than will a president who wishes to put more emphasis on the environment and conservation of natural resources. With the right combination of public support, Congressional leadership, and bipartisanship, effective environmental regulations and laws can be made. By delegating staff and other experts to particular issues, and by working with Congress to reach a desired outcome, the White House can influence the shape of environmental laws. Of course, the process is often complicated by gridlock. Rarely – if ever – does a significant majority of legislators agree on anything. Bills may or may not even reach the floor for a vote, depending on the party in power, the ability to reach agreement, and seemingly inevitable gridlock due to stalling tactics.
In Washington, the actual job of carrying out the implementation of a policy falls on the different executive departments. While all departments are involved in environmental quality to varying degrees, major regulators include the EPA, Interior Department, the Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Agriculture or USDA. And, as part of the balance of power in the U.S., the judiciary inevitably becomes involved in challenges to environmental policy.
Environmental law – checks and balances
Jurisdiction and the wording of the law are never crystal-clear. Legal challenges help to define boundaries on the reach of the regulatory agencies. A timely example of this policymaking process at work can be seen in the discussion of climate change and energy usage.
The climate change example breaks down like this: We’ve known for years that our current energy economy, based largely on fossil fuels, is unsustainable. Burning coal and oil to generate electricity, heat our homes, and fuel our cars not only pollutes the air and water but also adds staggering amounts of carbon to the atmosphere and oceans, which leads to climate change and the destruction of ecosystems. Yet, the United States has done little over the past few decades to curb energy use and carbon emissions. As a nation we’ve lacked the critical threshold of vocal citizens demanding change, and we’ve lacked political will to generate more enthusiasm for change. Only now are we beginning to see a possible shift in this state of mind. More people are concerned about energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and the science has improved to the point where there is very little doubt that humans are the driving force behind this phenomenon. Also, the current president (who campaigned on a desire to combat climate change) along with a relatively sympathetic Congress, United Nations, not to mention Corporate Leaders for Climate Change, share many similar policy goals. He has an easier time setting the agenda than if the party makeup of the House and Senate was more conservative, as it had been just several years ago.
While the political will for something like the Kyoto Protocol did not exist in the previous decade, we now are looking at a somewhat more favorable environment for that kind of legislation. The House recently passed the so-called Waxman-Markey bill, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, by a vote of 219 to 212 (Govtrack.us 2009). While the bill’s fate in the Senate is far from certain, clearly the right combination of attitudes and leadership exist to make this possible. Should climate legislation pass, the other steps in the policy cycle must also be seen through. Simply setting standards will not be enough.
In the final analysis, U.S. policy processes for environmental regulation do represent the American democratic process. An honorable legacy with our own children as well as our legacy as a nation is at stake. The hope is that this fair, reasonable democratic process will allow for suitable, correct action from policymakers with regards to this legacy.
COURTSEY. ENVIRONMENTAL LEADER
Maldives 'tourism boom' putting manta rays at risk
Despite its recent status as a Marine Protected Area (MPA), a popular tourist destination in the Maldives is facing a massive decline in wildlife and tourism unless proper management is put in place. Since being awarded MPA status in 2009 and receiving increased media interest, Hanifaru Bay in Baa Atoll has seen its tourism trade triple.But Guy Stevens, director of the Maldives Manta Ray Project, warns that without proper management this 'cannot go on', and suggests that in just 'five years we will see a massive decline in the number of animals that will come to Hanifaru'. Stevens says the area is 'failing as a Marine Protected Area', with no management or enforcing of regulations; he says it hasn't been a priority for the Maldives government and is just a 'paper park'. He adds that pressure is now on the authorities to 'sort it out' before the start of the next manta ray season.
Although the main area is only the size of a football pitch, Hanifaru is a world-famous feeding site for up to 250 manta rays, which have an average wingspan of 3m.
Stevens explains the problem is the 'sheer volume of people in the water' - he has seen as many as 13 boats and almost 200 people there at one time, inhibiting the animals' ability to feed: 'They just physically cannot swim through the water to feed on the plankton... The contact from people, touching, bumping into the animals disturbs their feeding behaviour.'
by ENN
Although the main area is only the size of a football pitch, Hanifaru is a world-famous feeding site for up to 250 manta rays, which have an average wingspan of 3m.
Stevens explains the problem is the 'sheer volume of people in the water' - he has seen as many as 13 boats and almost 200 people there at one time, inhibiting the animals' ability to feed: 'They just physically cannot swim through the water to feed on the plankton... The contact from people, touching, bumping into the animals disturbs their feeding behaviour.'
by ENN
Bangladesh, India most at risk from climate change
Bangladesh and India are the countries most vulnerable to climate change, according to an index on Wednesday that rates the Nordic region least at risk.
British consultancy Maplecroft said its rankings showed that several "big economies of the future" in Asia were among those facing the biggest risks from global warming in the next 30 years as were large parts of Africa.
It said poverty and large low-lying coastal regions prone to floods and cyclones were among factors making Bangladesh the most exposed country. India, in second place, was vulnerable because of pressures from a rising population of 1.1 billion.
Madagascar was in third place, followed by Nepal, Mozambique, the Philippines, Haiti, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe and Myanmar. Vietnam, in 13th place and flood-hit Pakistan in 16th were also in the most exposed group.
"Understanding climate vulnerability will help companies make their investments more resilient to unexpected change," wrote Matthew Bunce, principal analyst at Maplecroft, who noted that many Asian countries were attracting large investments.
Norway was bottom of the list of 171 nations, least vulnerable ahead of Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Sweden and Denmark -- all rich north European nations which may initially gain from factors such as longer crop growing seasons.
The ranking combined exposure to extremes such as droughts, cyclones and mudslides, sensitivity to damage tied to poverty, population, internal conflicts and dependence on agriculture, and the capacity of a country to adapt.
The U.N. panel of climate scientists says it is at least 90 percent likely that a build-up of greenhouse gases, mainly from human use of fossil fuels, is responsible for most warming in the past 50 years.
COURTSEY ENN
British consultancy Maplecroft said its rankings showed that several "big economies of the future" in Asia were among those facing the biggest risks from global warming in the next 30 years as were large parts of Africa.
It said poverty and large low-lying coastal regions prone to floods and cyclones were among factors making Bangladesh the most exposed country. India, in second place, was vulnerable because of pressures from a rising population of 1.1 billion.
Madagascar was in third place, followed by Nepal, Mozambique, the Philippines, Haiti, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe and Myanmar. Vietnam, in 13th place and flood-hit Pakistan in 16th were also in the most exposed group.
"Understanding climate vulnerability will help companies make their investments more resilient to unexpected change," wrote Matthew Bunce, principal analyst at Maplecroft, who noted that many Asian countries were attracting large investments.
Norway was bottom of the list of 171 nations, least vulnerable ahead of Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Sweden and Denmark -- all rich north European nations which may initially gain from factors such as longer crop growing seasons.
The ranking combined exposure to extremes such as droughts, cyclones and mudslides, sensitivity to damage tied to poverty, population, internal conflicts and dependence on agriculture, and the capacity of a country to adapt.
The U.N. panel of climate scientists says it is at least 90 percent likely that a build-up of greenhouse gases, mainly from human use of fossil fuels, is responsible for most warming in the past 50 years.
COURTSEY ENN
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)