Wednesday, October 8, 2014


Alternative & Renewable Energy

Could Africa be the Global Epicenter of Renewable Energy by 2030?

By: , Posted on:
Renewable Energy Integration coverToday, headlines like “Africa Rising” and “Africa Ascending” are often used around the world to describe the unprecedented transformation and steady economic growth on the continent. Over the past 12 months, I have attended several conferences in Africa and other parts of the world where this theme has been sounded.  The promising economic prospects for sub-Saharan Africa is also highlighted in the Africa Progress Panel 2014 report titled, Grain, Fish Money – Financing Africa’s Green and Blue Revolutions.
But, this should come as no surprise, since in recent years, six of the world’s fastest growing economies are in sub-Saharan Africa. In spite of the positive economic news, currently 74% of the population has no access to electricity, and should the current trend continue, over 800 million people could still be without access to power in the next sixteen years. At the same time, its fast growing population is projected to exceed 1.5 billion people by 2030.  Yet, it is well-known that to fuel economic growth and meet the growing consumption will require significant increase in access to energy. This must be done using ways and means that are both environmentally and financially sustainable.
Africa has vast and largely untapped endowment of renewables and is now seeing greater interest in using hydro, solar, wind, and geothermal to address the vexing problem of lack of access to electricity. In Chapter 3 of Renewable Energy Integration, “Harnessing and Integrating Africa’s Renewable Energy Resources,”, Ijeoma Onyeji provides a thorough discussion of the continent’s renewable landscape, and the potential challenges and the opportunities of tapping clean energy resources. Whether grid connected or off-grid systems, appropriate long-term policies along with adequate investment in infrastructure and human capacity are vital to harnessing the renewable energy in African countries.
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), the African Development Bank, the World Bank, the United Nations Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL), and other organizations, tens of billions of dollars will be needed annually to address Africa’s energy access challenges. Some estimate that at least $93 billion per year is required over the next decade.
Leaders of African countries and their bilateral partners realize the urgency to close investment gaps and have made energy a top development priority. For example, U.S. President Barack Obama last year launched a public-private sector initiative called Power Africa which aims to catalyze investments to support energy projects that will result in increasing energy access for 20 million people in sub-Saharan Africa. Power Africa will use various mechanisms to help accelerate the completion of transactions on the continent so that actual power projects can be implemented. This effort and other programs related to promoting investments in Africa’s energy infrastructure are expected to be discussed at the US-Africa Leaders Summit this week in Washington, DC. Heads of State from nearly all Africa countries will meet President Obama as well as other leaders from the U.S. Government and the private sector.
With 40% of Africa’s population living in rural areas by 2030, it is clear that centralized power stations connected to the grid will not be adequate nor economically feasible for providing universal and sustainable energy access to the millions of people in rural parts of the continent.  It is therefore important to point out that Power Africa will not only focus on centralized power stations and the grid. Instead, the U.S. Secretary of Energy Dr. Ernest Moniz recently launched a new framework under Power Africa called “Beyond the Grid”. It will leverage over $1 billon of commitment from the private sector into off-grid and small scale energy solutions for underserved mostly in rural communities of Africa.
In addition to the U.S. led efforts, governments in Africa are being flooded with project proposals from foreign and domestic investors seeking to cash in on Africa’s new energy bonanza. Partly fueling this bonanza is the fact that several countries are putting greater emphasis on how to best harness their abundant renewable resources. Investors are being attracted, in part, due to improved regulatory environment and policy incentives in countries such as Angola, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa, and Zambia.
So, in light of the above, could Africa be the global epicenter of renewable energy by 2030?
Today, providing the essential electrical energy services, e.g. lighting, water, food, refrigeration, mobile communication, internet access, is getting more affordable with renewables compared to the use of other conventional fuels. For example, lighting systems based on kerosene cost $4-$15 per month compared to $2 per month for solar lighting system. Also, continued advances in renewable technologies, costs reductions, improvements in the experience curve, and the adoption of successful business and best practice regulatory models could certainly spur faster growth as renewables are deployed to meet the needs of hundreds of millions of people in Africa.
Unlike most industrialized countries and other emerging markets, many countries in sub-Saharan Africa have a unique opportunity to leverage leapfrog technologies as well as state-of-the art regulatory models when making decisions about the development of their energy sector.  For example, providing universal access to hundreds of millions of people in rural communities using off-grid renewable solutions including mini- and micro-grids will create investment opportunities which drive the penetration of renewables. Advances in sensors and other metering technologies are proving to be viable solutions for ensuring revenue adequacy and financial solvency of utilities. For example, sensors and controls can be embedded in the distributed renewable energy solutions like solar PV. This will allow the energy service providers to collect revenue, but also help consumers manage their energy usage.
By 2030, the majority of the remaining 60% of Africa’s population in urban communities will expect to get their electricity services from grid-connected power stations.  Even in this scenario, renewable energy could play an important role. In several African countries, e.g. Ghana, Ethiopia, South Africa, large utility scale wind and solar plants are already being connected to the grid. Renewable Energy Integration deals with many of the salient issues and provides practical case studies from other utilities about managing variability, uncertainty, and flexibility associated with renewables. In Chapter 31, “Managing Operational Uncertainty through Improved Visualization Tools in Control Centers,” Richard Candy presents a case study from South Africa.
Africa’s large renewable potential such as the Grand Inga Hydro, and other large wind and solar plants will be better harnessed by making the different regional energy market work. Experiences from functioning electricity markets in other parts of world where renewables have been integrated between countries and across multiple regions can help Africa regional power pools design efficient markets. Regional integration also requires investments in power grid infrastructures, i.e. smart grid technologies, High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC), and Flexible Alternating Current Transmission Systems (FACTS).
An important aspect of successful markets is unbundling of generation, transmission, and distribution.  As African countries like Nigeria, Ghana move to unbundle and privatize their power generation and distribution sectors, they should consider the use of service- or performance-based regulatory models instead of traditional cost recovery mechanism based on volumetric sale of energy. Such models in which a myriad of energy-related services can be appropriately monetized have the potential to provide for a more flexible business environment that will benefit both the utility (large or small energy entrepreneur) and the consumer (grid or off-grid).
Indeed, Africa does have the potential to become the global epicenter for renewable energy by 2030 in ways that are financially and environmentally sustainable. The need to provide 800 million people access to electricity is gargantuan, and the market opportunities tremendous. However, this will largely depend on the decisions made by African governments, who must take the long-term view as they prepare and execute their energy roadmap to 2030 and beyond.
Last and perhaps most important, African governments must accelerate the development of human capital, including tapping into the vast amount of expertise in the diaspora, in order to properly leverage the flood of investments to build and maintain its energy infrastructure. Africa must then begin to use that energy to produce more value-added products and services for domestic, regional, and international markets.

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

UN climate protocols would ravage nations

UN climate protocols would ravage nations

Twenty Things YOU Can Do To Address the Climate Crisis!

Getting your mind around climate change is hard. Confronting it requires us to deal with the ways that coal, oil, and gas have shaped nearly every aspect of our world, from our built environments to our economic systems — even our ideologies and patterns of thought. But that doesn’t mean there aren’t concrete actions each of us can take, right now. Here are 20 examples of things YOU can do (some details are US-specific).

1. Reorganize the mode of production so that surplus and capital is distributed equally throughout society, and workers have decision-making power over their labor.
2. Find out about fossil fuel projects being built or proposed in your neighborhood (most of which can be found in the records of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or the Environmental Protection Agency) and mobilize your community against them. Read these excellent resources on how to start organizing your community and spread them far and wide.
3. Understand that while climate change affects us all, there are specific populations who are more vulnerable than others — these are low-income communities, communities of color, coastal communities and communities on the frontlines of fossil fuel extraction. Find a frontline organization near you and offer to support their work. Ask them what kind of help they need and take direction from them.
4. Lay off the policeman, the commodities trader, the real estate agent and the speculator in your head.
5. Read about what the crisis could potentially look like — go HERE or HERE or HERE or HERE or HERE — and think about what this could mean for you personally, or for people and places you love.
6. After you’ve read about the crisis, let yourself feel grief. Don’t ignore your feelings, either through resignation or through forced optimism. Feel what you feel.
7. Talk about your feelings with your family and friends. Talk about what matters to you, about what the climate crisis threatens in your life. And when they are ready, talk with them about taking action. You will learn things that you didn’t know about your loved ones, and you will discover allies in unexpected places.
8. Find out if your local politicians have ties to the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). Call out any politician that participates in or is a member of groups designed to give corporations the power to write the law.
9. Become an active voice in your community, writing letters to the editor in local papers and building an internet presence to spread information.
10. Do not fall into the trap of feeling contempt for your fellow human. These feelings are guaranteed to undercut your work. If you encounter resistance, consider carefully where that resistance comes from. Radical empathy is not only good for the soul, it will actually make you a more effective activist.
11. Look in the mirror. Do you see someone with job security? Someone who is in a position of privilege within your society? Think about how you can use this privilege to destroy the systems that created it — for instance, you may have less to lose than others by getting arrested for nonviolent civil disobedience.
12. Stay awake — there are all kinds of great resources for staying up-to-date about the climate crisis, and the more you know, the better you will be able to understand this moment.
13. Build resilience — support spaces that are growing food, going off-the-grid, or supplanting the capitalist state in providing for our basic human needs. If you are able to do so, consider building these spaces yourself.
14. Don’t blame the poor — don’t blame the worker whose industry job is the only job he could get, don’t blame the woman who buys carbon-intensive food for her family because that’s all that her budget and her neighborhood has to offer, don’t blame the big family in the developing world that doesn’t have access to family planning. The poor are not the problem. If you need to blame anyone, blame the ruling class that controls the options available to poor people in the US and around the world, and whose policies, consumption habits and ideology are far, far more responsible for the crisis.
15. Again — don’t blame the poor. Seriously.
16. Walk by yourself at night under the dark sky. Recognize that you only have one life, that you have more power than you realize, and that there is a grace and a joy that comes from using that power for something bigger than yourself.
17. Recognize that the climate crisis is complicated — no one person is going to solve it by themselves, and any “list” that suggests as much is probably lying, or at the very least advancing an individual-based value system that sounds suspiciously like advertising.
18. Go ahead and make changes to your consumption habits. But also remember that no slave was ever freed by individuals choosing to purchase products that are free from slave labor.
19. Truly addressing the crisis will require building people power on a scale that the world has never seen before.
20. Build that power. I wish you so much more than luck.
Patrick Robbins is a writer, researcher and activist based in Brooklyn. He is currently working with Sane Energy Project toward the goal of an entirely renewable New York, and was an active member of Occupy The Pipeline from 2012 to 2014.

United Nations News Centre - Benefits of investing in protection of biodiversity outweigh financial costs, says UN-backed report

United Nations News Centre - Benefits of investing in protection of biodiversity outweigh financial costs, says UN-backed report

Climate Change Causing CA Drought?

California has officially entered its fourth consecutive year of drought, and is trapped in its worst water shortage situation ever.
Because we know that human-caused climate change can trigger and exacerbate drought conditions, media, public officials, California residents and scientists have all been wondering for years if rising global temperatures likely caused or contributed to the current drought in California.
The short answer: Yes, they did.
Weather won’t cooperate
Scientists have suspected for some time now that a certain meteorological condition lies behind the long-lasting California drought. The persistence of a stubborn high-pressure system off the coast has been preventing storm systems from reaching California and instead deflecting them to Alaska and elsewhere.
While weather events are almost always multi-causal, the California drought is largely a result of this atmospheric weather pattern. The question is whether climate change has influenced the development, or sustenance, of this system.
Stanford scientists connected the dots
When destructive event happen, people want to know right then and there what’s going on— whether it’s an epidemic, riot or weather disaster.
But evaluating an extreme weather event for climate change influences is a scientific process that takes several months of computer simulations and statistical techniques. It can frustrate some who demand an answer right away.
Well, the results from several, month-long studies are finally in. Scientists from Stanford have found that the meteorological conditions that have caused the California drought are far more likely to occur in today’s warming world than in one without human-caused emissions of greenhouse gases.
It shows us – ironically and tragically – that the state that leads the nation in curbing greenhouse gas emissions is right now suffering more than any other from climate change.
California is not alone
The California drought attribution studies are a subset of alarger collection of recently published studies that explain 16 extreme weather and climate events of 2013.
Twenty research teams explored the causes of events such as heat waves in Australia, New Zealand, Korea, Japan, China, and Europe; torrential downpours in Colorado and India, a blizzard in South Dakota, and a cold spell in the United Kingdom.
The studies overwhelmingly indicated that all heat waves were largely attributable to human-caused climate change. One study even suggested that the heat wave in Korea has been made 10 times more likely due to human influence.
The extreme rainfall events in India were concluded to have been more likely in a human-influenced world, but data for assessing precipitation events is rather limited as compared to heat haves. Further, studies concluded that the extreme rainfall event in Colorado, the blizzard in South Dakota, and the cold spell in the U.K. were unlikely to have been influenced by climate change.
Climate change is happening. Now.
So for anyone who may still think that the consequences of climate change are in the distant future, this collection of studies suggest that human-caused climate change is right now causing a crisis in America’s most populous state and the world’s eighth largest economy.
California reminds us that climate change is a major concern for societies everywhere, and that all nations are vulnerable to extreme weather events. It’s time we roll up our sleeves and stop this, once and for all.
Ilissa Ocko helps EDF and the Office of Chief Scientist with anything concerning climate change. Ilissa’s main focus is helping EDF prioritize black carbon mitigation efforts based on the best available science. This article is republished with permission from EDF.

Read more: http://www.environmentalleader.com/2014/10/07/climate-change-causing-ca-draught/#ixzz3FZFwnxC6

Monday, October 6, 2014

http://environment.about.com/od/environmentalevents/fl/The-2014-UN-Climate-Summit-in-New-York.htm?nl=1

The 2014 UN Climate Summit in New York

An international meeting focusing on climate action announcements

UNSecBanKi-moon_AndrewBurton_GettyImageNews.jpg - Andrew Burton/Getty Image News
UN Secretary Ban Ki-moon addresses participants at 2014 Climate Summit in New York City.  Andrew Burton/Getty Image News
World leadership is gathering starting September 23 for the UN Climate Summit 2014. In addition to government officials, leaders of the private sector and nongovernmental organizations are invited to the United Nations Headquarters. The goal of this meeting is to provide a venue for participants to announce concrete plans towards greenhouse gas emission reductions and other solutions to the global climate change problem. In the words of the United Nations’ Secretary’s office, “the Climate Summit will be about action and solutions that are focused on accelerating progress in areas that can significantly contribute to reducing emissions and strengthening resilience – such as agriculture, cities, energy, financing, forests, pollutants, resilience and transportation.”
Do you have an environmental project? Win $100,000 USD
Start Earning from First Month! Low Investment High Return.
Up to 60% Off Across All Category Free Shipping and COD. Order Now.
No negotiations about the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change are expected at this meeting, yet it should be more than a roadside show. There is a lot of hope focused on the 2015 Paris Climate Change Conference, where leaders need to agree on a renewed, meaningful climate commitment following the expiration of the Kyoto Protocol. The 2014 UN Climate Summit in New York is seen as an important milestone, providing an opportunity for participants to diplomatically smooth out differences and forge alliances ahead of the Paris meeting.
An estimated 125 heads of state are expected to attend. Notably, the Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper declined to attend the summit. He delegated the task instead to Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq.
On Sunday September 21, two days before the conference began, the People's Climate March united over 300,000 in New York city for the largest climate march in history.
Source
United Nations. Climate Summit 2014.
http://www.environmentalleader.com/2014/10/06/assessing-the-environmental-impact-of-the-fashion-world/

Assessing the Environmental Impact of the Fashion World

For the third year, more than a thousand decision makers and thought leaders from 34 countries gathered for the Copenhagen Fashion Summit. From governments and global brands to princesses and pioneers, each attendee had one thing in common: the vision of a sustainable future for fashion.
Meanwhile, Sustainable Fashion Academy’s Global Leadership Award in Sustainable Apparel (GLASA), founded to inspire courageous leadership in the fashion industry, met to discuss natural capital accounting and incubate ideas we will use to tackle the challenges facing our planet.
One of these ideas is the potential of natural capital accounting to help the apparel sector accelerate its environmental impact reduction.
Few sectors are more emblematic of today’s consumer-driven growth model than the fashion industry. Ever more frequent overhauls of fashion ranges, psychological inducements to promote impulse buying, consumers who see shopping as their primary leisure activity, and of course – low prices.
The world’s resources cannot keep up with our increasing demand for throw-away fashion. Cotton, for example, a key input to the apparel industry, is responsible for 2.6 per cent of the global water use. However, a gap already exists between water supply and demand. If we do nothing to correct this imbalance, by 2030 demand for water will exceed supply by 40%.
Furthermore, an estimated 17 to 20% of industrial water pollution comes from textile dyeing and treatment and an estimated 8,000 synthetic chemicals are used throughout the world to turn raw materials into textiles, many of which will be released into freshwater sources. And it is not only the production of raw material that is water-intensive, the wet processing of clothing, such as wash­ing and dyeing, also consumes huge amounts of water.
The apparel sector presents a significant opportunity for the adoption of natural capital accounting.  Image and brand value is everything, making companies highly sensitive to reputational risk due to NGO campaigns and regulatory pressure. More positively, fashion often serves as an extension of personal values. So companies are well-placed to shape more sustainable consumer behaviour.
Natural capital is the environmental resources from which we make goods and services. It includes minerals, land and forests, as well as services such as a stable climate and clean air that sustain our ecosystem.
These natural goods and services are often freely provided to business and society by a healthy planet and the result is that our natural capital is being used at an unsustainable rate and being damaged. Climate change is the leading example. Manmade carbon emissions are damaging the planet’s ability to maintain a stable climate, resulting in global warming, rising sea levels and extreme weather. The over-abstraction of water resources by agriculture and industry, as well as rising populations, is also critical.
Natural capital accounting puts a monetary figure on environmental resources so that its value can be recognized. Companies, governments and investors can start to take environmental externalities into account in everyday decision making and compare these to other impacts using a common metric.
The merits of natural capital accounting were debated, from the practical (what will it take for natural capital accounting to become embedded in the everyday financial decision making of companies?) to the philosophical (could applying a monetary metric to sustainability issues exacerbate capitalist attitudes? might pricing negative impacts imply that corporations can ‘buy off’ the environmental damage they cause?)
But the world’s increasingly urgent environmental problems means we do not have time to wait. Richard Mattison, chief executive of natural capital analysts Trucost said: “We face a tipping point. The huge increase in middle class consumers across Asia is creating both an opportunity and a problem for traditional business models. Asia is viewed as a growth market with huge increases in demand but traditional forms of production come with a rising environmental cost that is unsustainable and unacceptable. For example, demand for water is predicted to exceed supply by 40% over the coming 10-15 years. Business as usual is broken. We need to revolutionise our approach to design and production, decoupling growth from environmental impact. The time to do that is now.”
Trucost has been working with the Sustainable Fashion Academy to develop the apparel sector’s thinking on natural capital. This resulted in a white paper which was launched in Copenhagen. It makes a series of recommendations on how to build on existing initiatives and accelerate uptake.
It’s people who make the clothes that we wear
When the Rana Plaza factory collapsed in the Bangladesh capital last year more than 1000 garment workers were killed, twice as many were injured and 800 children were orphaned.
Sixty million people globally work in the fashion industry, yet somewhere along the line – we seem to have forgotten that the clothes we buy are made by people. Livia Firth, owner of Eco Age, said, “It’s a case of out of sight, out of mind. We cannot keep eating from this big, cheap fashion pile without thinking about who made our clothes.”
Sadly, Rana Plaza is not the only example of wide-scale factory deaths, nor the only example of social inequality along the value chain. Negative social impacts occur at every stage, from the farmers who grow the cotton, to those who stitch the logos. For making a $100 pair of trainers, the factory worker will receive just 50 cents. If you buy a pair of jeans for £15 – what do you really expect the working conditions will be like for those that made them?
Inspiring efforts to put social capital back on the map ranged from enterprise brands to SMEs. A GLASA nominee ‘Pants to Poverty’ were not content with measuring profit alone – so went one step further by combining social capital accounting with business accounts, creating an integrated 3D Profit and Loss statement – a full picture of the business’ impact on people, profit and planet. Ben Ramsden, founder of Pants to Poverty and Pi Foundation said “It is our hope to launch this process and support its emergence as a new standard for corporate reporting. The economic analysis for our 3D P&L was done by our project partners Trucost and GIST Advisory, world leaders in business impact valuations. Together, we are proving that not only is this possible but that business is better in 3D.”
Thirsty crops – why shareholders are finally putting sustainability on the agenda
Fortunately eco-warriors and sustainability managers were not alone in Copenhagen, other attendees included investors, many of whom, are finally pushing sustainability to the top of the corporate agenda. Why? Because nature is biting back.
In 2011, drought struck Texas, forcing farmers to abandon millions of acres of cotton and corn. The price tag – $5.2 billion in losses. China’s 2010 drought resulted in knock-on price increases of cotton of 150%. H&M was one of the many companies affected, announcing a 30% drop in profits, after deciding to internalise the inflation. Perhaps it is unsurprising then, that investors are pushing companies to take a strategic approach to water risk and uncover the true cost of their natural capital dependencies.
Cotton – an essential global commodity and the largest single source of fibre for global apparel – is used by nearly every person on the planet on a daily basis. For millions of people in some of the world’s poorest countries, cotton is also a vital link to the global economy.
However, it is associated with significant natural capital dependency, heavily reliant on water for irrigation, land requirements, and chemicals which can result in pollution to land, water and air. The most material impact of cotton farming is water consumption, with $83 billion natural capital costs globally.
Over 53% of cotton fields in the world require irrigation, and the majority are in regions where water is scarce. The impacts on the Aral Sea, Central Asia are a notorious example: in the period 1960-2000, the Aral Sea lost approximately 70% of its volume as a result of diverting water to grow cotton in the desert. See table below for cotton’s water use by region.
TCTSIG table
It is therefore unsurprising that the sector has particularly felt the effects of natural capital-related issues, such as increasingly volatile prices of materials like cotton, due to droughts and floods, in the form of top and bottom line impacts.
Activities already undertaken in the sector such as the Better Cotton Initiative have begun to work with farmers to improve cotton farming through better management, organic practices, responsible agrochemical use and other techniques. There is enormous opportunity for improving yields, quality and profitability for farmers while reducing environmental impacts. The benefits of better risk management thus manifest themselves in a range of positive environmental and societal shifts. For example, a field study in India showed that application of improved practices resulted in agrochemical reductions of 81%, water reduction of 49%, chemical fertiliser reduction of 18% and a 15% increase in farmer profitability.
Businesses that will stand the test of time will be those who understand the importance of a strategy which takes into account natural capital at its true cost. If they won’t do it for the planet – then let’s hope they’ll do it for the profit. As with increasing stakeholder pressure for ‘better’ cotton – that will be good news for investors, farmers, brands and of course, nature.
TCTSIG graph
Clothing the Loop – Wasted Wardrobes
One of the most resource-intensive industries in the world, the $1.2 trillion global textile and apparel industry is built on complex linear supply chains. Lack of visibility over what’s happening further down that chain has often resulted in toxic pollution, unethical labour practices and escalating waste, with the rise of ‘fast fashion’ sending materials hurtling towards end-of-life quicker than ever. In the U.S. the average person discards 32kg of clothing annually. The Agency estimates 85% of these wind-up in landfills or incinerators, and that’s just America. Sadly, the story around the rest of the world isn’t much different.
China’s textile industry processed 41.3 million tonnes of fibre and accounted for 53% of the world’s total production. Millions of tonnes of unused fabric at Chinese mills go to waste each year when dyed the wrong colour. In 2010, 234 tonnes of textiles went into landfill in Hong Kong alone. Meanwhile, customers in the U.K. have an estimated $46.7 billion worth of unworn clothes lingering in their closets.
Educating Consumers & Designers
It is shocking facts like these that brought closed-loop-textiles to the tip of everyone’s tongue in Copenhagen. Helena Helmersson, Head of Sustainability at H&M, spoke about their eco-efforts, including their new in-store garment collection programme which gathered 5,000 tonnes of used clothes last year. Meanwhile, Vanessa Friedman, chief fashion critic of the New York Times had another serious criticism to make. Fashion, by nature, is about this season, it’s about the latest – out with the old, in with the new; new cuts, new colours, new fabrics, not only every season but every month. “Designers are effectively running on a creative treadmill that is unsustainable”. Vanessa harked back to the days of her Nan, who bought a couple of key items of quality clothing and loved them for life. This, is what we should be doing today – building a timeless wardrobe which doesn’t need monthly revamps just because Vogue says so.
Further Down the Chain
Dutch aWEARness, creates clothes from 100% recyclable polyester. It uses 95% less water & 64% less energy during production than standard cotton
One company that has mastered the intricacies of textile recycling is London-based LMB. The company has found a goldmine in Britons’ annual one million tonne apparel disposal, and either recycles or finds an alternative use for everything from saris to flares. Over in the Netherlands, Dutch aWEARness, creates clothes from 100% recyclable polyester. It uses 95% less water, 64% less energy and produces 73% fewer carbon emissions during production than standard cotton. Once the products reach end-of-life, they are transformed back into new clothing, with no loss of quality.
We’re not there yet, but with product innovation, consumer education, pioneering brands and a little attention to the supply chain we might just begin to see less clothes travel from cradle to grave and many reincarnated time and time again.
Jacqueline Jackson is an account director who joined Trucost in 2014. She is responsible for managing corporate client relationships and business development, specializing in technology, telecommunications, media and retail. She has extensive experience of working with public and private organizations to assist with business strategy and delivery. In 2011 she founded an e-Commerce site, providing designers who up-cycle the portal to promote sustainable fashion and arts to a global market. Jacqueline has an MFA in Fine Art from the University of Oxford. This article was republished with permission from Trucost.
Write a column for EL's Industry Voices section
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this story.






Advertisers